Last
week I saw the great Gatsby, a movie directed by Baz Luhrmann and
starring Leonardo DiCaprio. I wrote last week that the World Health
Assembly is bombastic, but this movie over tops the Assembly easily.
Mr Gatsby holds staggeringly sumptuous parties in his mansion. The
1920s come alive in the movie with all-singing and all-dancing
effects, and with Jay-Z's audacious music. Digital panoramas of New
York make you dizzy. Fortunately, the story is less complex and easy
to follow. Mr Gatsby was years ago in love with Daisy who now lives
just across the bay from Gatsby, with her boorish wealthy husband
Tom. Gatsby left her many years ago to first make a fortune with
illegal deals in the prohibition years so that they would be rich
before they started to live.
The
parties he now organises are nothing more than an attempt to win her
back, but she never shows up. After arranging a meeting through
Daisy's cousin Nick, who happens to live next to him, he finally
meets her again and a competition follows between the two lovers. But
that is maybe not most important. What the movie is really about is
that getting rich first is not always the right strategy. And that
over-consumption, selfishness and low moral standards do not make you
happy in the end.
The
individualization and demoralization of the 1920s is perhaps the very
start of the trend in the second part of the 20th century that is
still continuing today. This week in Herald Tribune there was a great
article by David Brook: "What our words tell us". The
Google database that contains 5,2 mln books between 1500 en 2008
gives some interesting insights. Researchers looked at how frequently
words were used between 1960 and 2008 and discovered the same two
main trends. First, individualism has increased as was shown by the
increased use of words and phrases such as personalised, preferences,
self, standout, unique, 'I come first' and 'I can do it myself'. On
the other side of the coin there was a much lower use of words like
community, collective, share, united and common good. The second
trend, demoralization is also on the rise, reflected by the decreased
use of words like virtue, decency, conscience, honesty, patience,
compassion, courage, bravery, faith and wisdom. The word humility was
even 52% less used.
Brook
himself identifies a third trend, governalization and I think he is
right. I am sometimes surprised how often our politicians are in the
news and how much importance is attached to what they say and do.
Politics and media are more connected than ever before.
The
overall story according to Brook is that over the last 50 years
society became more individualistic and less morally aware. This led
to social breakdowns which government tried to address, sometimes
successfully and sometimes impotently. And perhaps the government
could be smaller when the social fabric of society was more tightly
knit.
For
long-term care we also had and still have to cope with these trends,
both in the Netherlands and probably also increasingly world wide.
People have become more individualistic and rely less on their family
and social networks. The government has stepped in with big schemes
and now provides or finances much long-term care to people. The
government is judged by the people on the ability to deliver and care
has become a right rather than a shared responsibility. The public
sector and those delivering the care also have to face people that
are attaching less value to morals. In less kind words, people who
are probably less decent, honest and modest when using care.
In
the Netherlands we will attempt to reverse the trends by delivering
less public services and by asking people to rely more on their
social networks when they get old. I mentioned that in previous
blogs. We also try to increase their moral standards, among others by
asking them to report on inefficiencies in the care system (last week
an internet based reporting point was opened). Not so much much by
focusing on dishonest behaviour, but rather by together addressing
inefficiencies in the care sector. However, much is of course related
to 'careless' acts.
And
what can we learn from the movie? Well, Gatsby did not get his love
again. He was killed by the guy whose wife he killed by reckless
driving with his sports car after a binge in New York. At the end
Nick tells him that 'You can’t repeat the past, old sport'. We will
see whether in Holland we can at least change the past, when it comes
to long-term care.
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten